This is a blog for the discussion of curious trivia (as the name was designed to suggest). I read all comments, so don't hesitate to post a comment even if the post is years old: these are long-term interests of mine! I don't post every day, I'm afraid, so I suggest that, if you are interested, you go to http://www.changedetection.com/ and put the name of this blog in it, so that you will be e-mailed when there is a new post or comment.

Thursday, June 07, 2007

Are Charles and Camilla married?

Since members of the royal family are exempt from the Marriages Act (1949) it would seem that their marriage was valid only if, (since they were married in England) they were married in a ceremony of the Church of England (which, of course, they were not -- though I don't know whether the reasons why not were to do with Charles or to do with Camilla). The present government, unlike its predecessor, thinks, however, that the Human-Rights Act 1998 (which, ironically, Charles himself, in a letter to the previous Lord Chancellor, denounced as “a threat to sane, civilised and ordered existence”) mandates a liberal interpretation of the Marriages Act such that Charles's human rights should not be infringed by his being prevented from contracting a civil marriage.

There is another question, of course, as to whether Charles could have married her had he been King and thereby Supreme Governor of the Church of England (since it was apparently for this reason that the Queen felt that she couldn't be present at the ceremony): Edward VIII famously had to abdicate in order to marry Mrs Simpson.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home