This is a blog for the discussion of curious trivia (as the name was designed to suggest). I read all comments, so don't hesitate to post a comment even if the post is years old: these are long-term interests of mine! I don't post every day, I'm afraid, so I suggest that, if you are interested, you go to http://www.changedetection.com/ and put the name of this blog in it, so that you will be e-mailed when there is a new post or comment.

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

George IV

George IV also took part in a putative marriage ceremony that was null and void: in 1785, aged 23, he married the Roman-Catholic widow Maria Anne Fitzherbert. Under the Royal-Marriages Act, however, the union was null and void as he did not have the permission of his father, the king, and he was under 25. (The king would certainly not have given him permission as that would have meant that under the Act of Settlement his son would have forfeited the throne.) One wonders, however, why the couple did not wait till George was 25 before getting married. Perhaps it was done for the sake of Mrs Fitzherbert. In fact, Rome pronounced that the marriage was valid. Since Mrs Fitzherbert did not die till 1837 this invalidated George's putative marriage in 1795 to Caroline of Brunswick, though he continued to 'see' Mrs Fitzherbert (and other women) after the ceremony anyway. Since George was drunk during the ceremony and marrying under compulsion from his father the putative marriage wouldn't have been valid anyway. Interestingly George later tried unsuccesfully to divorce Queen Caroline, but never seems to have argued that the marriage was null and void. The only child of the putative marriage, Princess Charlotte Augusta would thus be illegitimate (certainly in the eyes of Rome).

2 Comments:

Blogger Joseph Shaw said...

NB George didn't 'see' Maria Fitzherbert after his marriage to Caroline. Under pressure from his parents, he broke off relations with her before getting engaged to Caroline. In fact I don't think he ever saw her again.

The urgency of his marriage to Maria was emotional. As a very pious Catholic, Maria would never have consented to be his mistress; George either did, or pretended, to attempt suicide, to persuade her to marry him. They lived happily as man and wife for a number of years; although the marriage wasn't recognised in English law, George always lifted the rules of precedence when he entertained with her, so she could sit near him.

8:31 pm

 
Blogger Daniel Hill said...

Thanks, Joseph. I was relying on this sentence from Wikipedia (http://tinyurl.com/2aoktt):
'The Prince of Wales remained attached to Mrs Fitzherbert for the rest of his life, despite several periods of estrangement.'
The authority (http://tinyurl.com/2b67bd) given for this is:
David, Saul (2000). Prince of Pleasure: The Prince of Wales and the Making of the Regency.
Wikipedia (http://tinyurl.com/2bdh25) also says:
Maria and the Prince continued to see one another romantically even after the Prince's marriage to Caroline of Brunswick, and the prince returned to live with Maria in about 1800, but their relationship had ended permanently by 1811.
Another Web site (http://tinyurl.com/yprpjh) says that Mrs Fitzherbert sought the Pope's ruling on the marriage prior to getting back together with George from 1800 to 1807 (though George had putatively married Caroline in 1796 and the latter didn't die till 1821), which makes sense given what you say about her strong morals.

8:01 am

 

Post a Comment

<< Home